Has anyone who’s sensitive to EMF’s used the Light Phone II? I’d be very curious to hear how you felt using it. And if you’ve used the Mudita Pure, how you felt in comparison.
While the head SAR of the Pure is .07 W/kg (over 1g/Cellular) (USA), the body SAR of the Pure is fairly high, at 1.13 W/kg (over 1g/Cellular) (USA). Is anyone else concerned about the high body SAR?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Is head SAR really the thing to be focusing on if you’re going to be using the phone on speakerphone anyway and never holding it to your head?
Has anyone who’s received the Pure tested it with an EMF reader yet? Would LOVE to see the results.
Has anyone tested the Light Phone II with an EMF reader? A comparison would be awesome.
While the Light Phone II has a head SAR of 1.20 W/kg, it’s body SAR is significantly lower than the Pure’s, coming in at .52 W/kg. It would be nice if the Pure had a body SAR that was at least as low as the Light Phone II’s, would it not?
Would love to hear everyone’s thoughts and experiences
Jzt I personallly don’t find a lot of value in SAR ratings. If you’re truly interested in EMR and minimising you’re exposure You are better off determining power density exposure (uW/m2 or V/m) by taking real world measurements. I do so with a Acoustimeter AM11 which does a reasonably accurate job. I’ll post results on the Pures measurements in this forum when I receive my phone.
Thanks rumpole. Would love to see your EMF reader results on the Pure. Have you (or has anyone else) used an EMF reader on the Light Phone II for comparison?
Hey Jose. Have you had an opportunity to use an EMF reader to gather readings on both the Mudita Pure and the Light Phone II? Very interested in hearing your results comparing the readings between these two phones.