Hi! I love your concepts and approach for your devices. I’m interested in the Pure, but so far I have not seen any confirmation of one of its key features - namely, the low SAR value.
In your antenna patent, you compare two antenna designs, and the one you patented showed lower EMF strength at a distance. This, however, says nothing about the SAR of the device.
I know patents are usually kept cryptic and ambiguous, but the only hard fact presented in the patent is that you managed to develop a poorly working antenna, since to achieve the same level of cellular reception, you have to pump more energy into it.
SAR is measured using specially-designed human phantom. The whole device design matters - how the antenna is positioned and shielded from the user, and how the EMF distribution in space looks. You are getting closer to launch, and still have not provided solid evidence for your claim.
Could you perhaps make a video showing some quick measurements using a handheld EMF meter? Low EMF at the front side would mean there is a chance that there would be a lower EMF absorption in the head, and so - a lower SAR.
I really like your products, but the low SAR value is the thing I was hoping for in Pure.