@gmahale
Thanks for your detailed follow-up! I appreciate your engagement and the opportunity to clarify a few points. We know everyone in this community cares deeply about privacy and simplicity, so these conversations are incredibly valuable to us.
To your point about potential software bugs being serious vulnerabilities, you’re absolutely right! Any vulnerability should indeed be resolved with the highest priority. However, the reality is that even the most robust software can have flaws. Our choice to physically disconnect the modem and microphone is about adding an extra layer of assurance that goes beyond software alone. It might seem like an over-engineering headache to some, but for those who prioritize absolute privacy, this feature provides peace of mind that no unexpected reconnection can happen.
Check out this recent thread:
Regarding the e-ink screen and its alignment with our ethos of simplicity and mindfulness, I get where you’re coming from. Reflective LCDs and OLEDs do indeed have their benefits. However, e-ink is unique in that it mimics the experience of reading on paper. It’s less straining on the eyes over extended use, and it supports our vision of a distraction-free device by not emitting the same kind of harsh, direct light. For us, it’s about creating a screen experience that encourages mindful use – one that doesn’t pull you into the device but allows you to engage on your terms.
We’ve written about this in a couple of articles:
Ultimately, our choices reflect a balance between privacy, simplicity, and user experience. They won’t resonate with everyone, and that’s okay! We’re building for a specific community that values these principles, and we’re grateful to have voices like yours challenging us to refine our thinking.
Thanks again for sharing your thoughts – and for being a part of this dialogue!